2015
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/3175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental comparison of empirical material decomposition methods for spectral CT

Abstract: Material composition can be estimated from spectral information acquired using photon counting x-ray detectors with pulse height analysis. Non-ideal effects in photon counting x-ray detectors such as charge-sharing, k-escape, and pulse-pileup distort the detected spectrum, which can cause material decomposition errors. This work compared the performance of two empirical decomposition methods: a neural network estimator and a linearized maximum likelihood estimator with correction (A-table method). The two inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Zimmerman et al [14], we used an ANN architecture composed of one input layer, two hidden layers, and one output layer. The input and output layers contained 24 nodes each, which correspond to 24 desired input and output energy bins (from 27 to 50 keV), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to Zimmerman et al [14], we used an ANN architecture composed of one input layer, two hidden layers, and one output layer. The input and output layers contained 24 nodes each, which correspond to 24 desired input and output energy bins (from 27 to 50 keV), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various empirical methods have been proposed to compensate for PCXD spectral distortions [13, 14]. Corrections undo the distortion process, while compensation is used to offset the effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beer-Lambert's transmission model states the expected number of transmitted energy-resolved photons (1) where N i is the number of detected photons and W i is the detector element sensitivity in the i th energy-bin, S(E) is the source spectrum, and µ(E, x) is the linear attenuation coefficient map of the object being imaged along a given ray path. We attempt to decompose the linear attenuation coefficient map into a specific material basis,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-layer feed-forward neural network was used to estimate the basis material path lengths from the post-log energy-resolved data vector, L. 1 The number of energy bins and the number of basis materials determine the number of processing elements in the input-layer and the output-layer, respectively. The number of hidden processing elements, n H , is a design parameter and was selected to minimize the mean-square-error of the estimated path lengths of the calibration step wedge phantom.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that I 0 is absorbed into this expansion by not normalizing the spectrum representation. The advantages of this model are: (1) as will be seen, transmission measurements can be accurately modeled at low polynomial degree d, (2) for even d the spectrum boundary conditions are satisfied if α d > 0, (3) non-negativity of the spectrum model is automatically enforced, and (4) the form of the expansion is potentially convenient for simultaneous spectrum estimation and spectral CT image reconstruction, because the expansion coefficients α n enter the transmission model in a linear combination with the material thicknesses L m . For the image reconstruction problem, the quantities L m are the projection of the unknown material maps in the spectral CT image reconstruction problem.…”
Section: Polynomial Models For Spectrum Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%