2009
DOI: 10.1364/jon.8.000491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental comparison of high-speed transmission control protocols on a traffic-driven labeled optical burst switching network test bed for grid applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the traditional labeled OBS (LOBS) network [10] and the testbed we implemented [11], the multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) based control plane conducts open shortest path first (OSPF)-based routing and resource reservation protocol (RSVP)-based resource reservation in a distributed manner. That is to say, each node is able to compute the route and process the RSVP-based signaling messages for end-to-end label switched path (LSP) provisioning.…”
Section: Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the traditional labeled OBS (LOBS) network [10] and the testbed we implemented [11], the multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) based control plane conducts open shortest path first (OSPF)-based routing and resource reservation protocol (RSVP)-based resource reservation in a distributed manner. That is to say, each node is able to compute the route and process the RSVP-based signaling messages for end-to-end label switched path (LSP) provisioning.…”
Section: Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes FAST TCP subject to false congestion identification and may seriously impair the TCP throughput. Accordingly, experimental study in [11] indicated that FAST TCP is not suitable for OBS networks. Motivated by the interesting scenario, this paper investigates the FAST TCP over OBS networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%