2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-010-0918-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental comparison of measurement techniques for drop size distributions in liquid/liquid dispersions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
97
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Further based on similar measurements reported elsewhere [14] and in the current work, the values they obtained are significantly smaller than would be expected for the liquid phases employed and the very poor mixing conditions of the device at the operating conditions employed as noted previously. The apparent under-prediction of the droplet size in these measurements is consistent with the comparison of Maaß et al [13] in which FBRM was found to give results an order of magnitude smaller than those from direct imaging using an endoscope probe.…”
Section: Centrifugal Contactor Mixing Vane Options 673supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further based on similar measurements reported elsewhere [14] and in the current work, the values they obtained are significantly smaller than would be expected for the liquid phases employed and the very poor mixing conditions of the device at the operating conditions employed as noted previously. The apparent under-prediction of the droplet size in these measurements is consistent with the comparison of Maaß et al [13] in which FBRM was found to give results an order of magnitude smaller than those from direct imaging using an endoscope probe.…”
Section: Centrifugal Contactor Mixing Vane Options 673supporting
confidence: 89%
“…A number of methods for in situ measurement are available including both image processing and laser-based techniques, though it has been shown that large discrepancies can exist between the data measured using the various tools, and direct imaging and image processing is still considered the most reliable. [13] In addition, the use of an intrusive probe is questionable in centrifugal contactors given the limited flow area of the mixing zone. Schuur et al give data obtained from a focused beam reflective measurement (FBRM) probe positioned between housing vanes under the rotor.…”
Section: Centrifugal Contactor Mixing Vane Options 673mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect the drop size distribution (at T = 293 K) in a baffled stirred tank DN150 (H/D = 1) equipped with a Rushton turbine (d/D = 0.33) an endoscope technique was used. For detailed description of this set-up and measurement technique see Maaß et al (2011) and Ritter and Kraume (2000). Continuous phase was deionised water with added NaOH (Merck 1.09956 p.a.…”
Section: Experimental Investigations In Stirred Tankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For drop size measurements, Maaß et al (2011) compared a focus beam reflectance instrument (FBRM), a twodimensional optical reflectance instrument and a fibre optical focus beam reflectance sensor in a stirred vessel, and illustrated the limitations of the techniques based on the laser back-scatter principle. The FBRM probe has also been implemented during pipe flows (Schümann et al 2016a), but with reported uncertainties of 50%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%