2009 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security &Amp; Rescue Robotics (SSRR 2009) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ssrr.2009.5424151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental comparison of robotics locomotion with passive tether and active tether

Abstract: Most small robots require a tethered connection with a power and control source. The tether has advantages, namely robust communication and safe recovery, and disadvantages, tangling with obstacles and rough terrain. Active tether is a new research area for tethered robot systems. It provides continuously distributed form of actuation for robots that results from the effect of water hammer. It also reduces the friction of the tether by the jerks from the water hammer effect. In this paper, we duplicate the act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We disregarded the Z direction as the tube existed in a planar space. For more details about experimental setup please see [13]. The experiment included measurement of 20 distinct shapes.…”
Section: B Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We disregarded the Z direction as the tube existed in a planar space. For more details about experimental setup please see [13]. The experiment included measurement of 20 distinct shapes.…”
Section: B Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion was that the tether aided by the water hammer effect was able to pull a weight almost twice that of the unaided tether. For more indepth experimental set up and results please see [23]- [24]. …”
Section: A Actuation -Water Hammermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We disregarded the Z direction as the tube existed in a planar space. For more details about the setup please see [23]- [24].…”
Section: A) Computer Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 presents an experiment where a front-mounted vehicle is aided by an active tether, with a weight being placed on top of the tether. A vehicle with an active tether was able to pull a weight of almost double the amount of a passive tether (6.25 kg vs 3.85 kg) [52]. Table 1 For an all-polymer robot, we need to eliminate the wheeled robot from Figure 5 so that only the tubing is actuating itself.…”
Section: Desired Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%