Experimental comparisons between SAODV and AODV routing protocols

Lin, Yuxia; Rad, A.H.M.; Wong, Vincent W. S.; Song, Jay Hyok

doi:10.1145/1089737.1089757

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among papers that experimentally assess the performance of proactive MANET routing protocols, the most common evaluative metric was throughput, typically TCP throughput [2,4,7,9,12,13,16]. Other popular metrics were packet delivery or loss rates [1,3,7,10,13,20], "ping" success rates [4,20], latency [1,9,10], overhead [3,10,13], and average hop count [10].…”

Section: Previous Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other popular metrics were packet delivery or loss rates [1,3,7,10,13,20], "ping" success rates [4,20], latency [1,9,10], overhead [3,10,13], and average hop count [10]. We could not find any further evaluation of protocol performance in an experimental setting.…”

Section: Previous Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this context, route performance has been defined in multiple ways including, but not limited to, the percentage of packets that arrived [1,3,7,10,13,20], throughput (usually TCP throughput) [2,4,7,9,12,13,16] and round trip time or latency [1,9,10]. While these metrics provide quantitative points for evaluation, they concentrate on the performance of reported routes and do not directly evaluate how well a routing protocol performs its primary task: to find and maintain routes in a MANET based on decision metrics.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A method of proactive MANET routing protocol evaluation applied to the OLSR protocol

Thompson

MacKenzie²,

DaSilva

2011

Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental Evaluation and Characterization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional evaluation studies of MANET routing protocols have concentrated on quantitative, traffic-based metrics like throughput and packet loss. These metrics provide a limited evaluation of protocol performance because they do not measure how well the protocol finds and maintains routes, only how well functional routes perform, once established. This work proposes a method for assessing how well a proactive MANET routing protocol tracks the network topology by comparing the reported routes to the actual topology. This study exposes the impact of routing message propagation and message loss on MANET routing by showing the existence of errant routes and protocol-reported information, specifically broken routes, incorrect routing table hop counts, and existing routes that were not found by the protocol. We use this approach to analyze the performance of the OLSR protocol in a medium-sized MANET, using data from the MANIAC Challenge. The results favor OLSR, but expose errant routes, how often they occur and for how long.

show abstract

Section: Previous Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Previous Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A method of proactive MANET routing protocol evaluation applied to the OLSR protocol

Thompson

MacKenzie²,

DaSilva

2011

Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental Evaluation and Characterization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this section, we analyze the security threats and show how the ESecRout protocol mitigates these threats. Several attacks [4,16] can be launched against the routing in the sensor network such as:…”

Section: Security Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

ESecRout: An Energy Efficient Secure Routing for Sensor Networks

Yin

Madria

2008

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we present an Energy Efficient Secure Routing Protocol for Sensor Networks (ESecRout). The protocol uses the symmetric cryptography to secure messages, and uses a small cache in sensor nodes to record the partial routing path (previous and next nodes) to the destination. It guarantees that the destination will be able to identify and discard the tampered messages and ensure that the messages received are not tampered with. Simulation shows ESecRout's performance comparison with the non-secure routing protocol AODV [1] and the secure routing protocol SAODV [2]. Our protocol needs a little more route discovery overhead (about 8%) and costs a little more energy (about 8%) than AODV, but it performs much better than SAODV which needs much more route discovery overhead (about 33%) and costs much more energy (35%) than AODV. Simulation results also show that the packet delivery ratio and packet latency of AODV, SAODV, and ESecRout are almost the same. Thus, we show that our protocol ESecRout provides energy efficient secure routing.

show abstract

“…Addressing the security of a routing protocol is crucial to enhance the reliability of the network [16][17][18]. In the past, researchers have proposed various secure versions of the traditional routing protocols, e.g., S-AODV [19], SOLSR [20], and S-DYMO [21]; a survey of these approaches can be found in [22][23][24]. Node addressing, lookup, and routing mechanisms in the DHT-based routing protocols are different from the traditional routings, which raise new security issues that may degrade the performance and reliability of the network.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Secure Data Dissemination in a DHT-Based Routing Paradigm for Wireless Ad Hoc Network

Kousar

Alhaisoni

Akhtar

et al. 2020

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past decade, distributed hash table- (DHT-) based routing protocols have been adopted in wireless ad hoc networks (WANETs) to achieve scalability in the route discovery phase by avoiding the flooding mechanism. The security aspects of the routing protocols based on the DHT mechanism are crucial to address and have not been discussed in the existing literature. Therefore, addressing the security issues in DHT-based routing protocols would prevent the service disruption, decrease the traffic overhead, and reduce the packet loss in the network. In this paper, several security issues are identified and elaborated through an example scenario. Moreover, a novel DHT-based routing protocol is proposed that uses a digital signature and the user’s trust in order to swap securely the logical identifiers (LIDs). Trust between nodes is established by the user’s acquaintance and the first visual contact. The proposed protocol vindicates its effectiveness via simulation results in terms of computation time, normalized overhead, percent improvement, and packet delivery ratio.

show abstract

Experimental comparisons between SAODV and AODV routing protocols

Cited by 15 publications

References 27 publications

A method of proactive MANET routing protocol evaluation applied to the OLSR protocol

A method of proactive MANET routing protocol evaluation applied to the OLSR protocol

ESecRout: An Energy Efficient Secure Routing for Sensor Networks

A Secure Data Dissemination in a DHT-Based Routing Paradigm for Wireless Ad Hoc Network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About