2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-005-0617-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Conditions Favoring the Formation of Fluid Banks during Counter-Current Flow in Porous Media

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate factors that affect the formation of fluid banks during gravity-driven counter-current flow in porous media. To our knowledge, development of a fluid bank has been observed in only one previous counter-current flow experiment, although there are some hints of fluid banks in other experiments. We have undertaken experimental and simulation studies to confirm the presence of such banks and to delineate factors which enhance or inhibit their formation. Experiments were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note also that experiments performed by Templeton et al (1961), and more recently by Karpyn et al (2006), started from an initial water saturation profile that was essentially constant throughout the column. The observed final profiles seem to confirm qualitatively our computational results for the present theory, reported already in Hilfer (2006c), Hilfer and Doster (2010), and Doster et al (2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We note also that experiments performed by Templeton et al (1961), and more recently by Karpyn et al (2006), started from an initial water saturation profile that was essentially constant throughout the column. The observed final profiles seem to confirm qualitatively our computational results for the present theory, reported already in Hilfer (2006c), Hilfer and Doster (2010), and Doster et al (2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The literature reports similar observations from gravity-driven countercurrent flow experiments, in which drainage, imbibition, and middle transition zones are identified. [11][12][13] Fig.5 also show uneven movement of the invading water front, due mainly to rock heterogeneities and boundary effects. The wavy water front is caused by capillary contrast in the rock layers, which are aligned perpendicular to the fracture.…”
Section: Experimental Observationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They found the "fluid bank" existed at the top of the tube. Karpyn et al [25] investigated factors that affect the formation of "fluid bank" in the countercurrent flow process by CT scan and reservoir simulation. Base on the conventional reservoir type classification, the "gas bank" located at the top of the model is called the secondary gas cap in this paper [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%