2000 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 38th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37059)
DOI: 10.1109/relphy.2000.843940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental data and statistical models for bimodal EM failures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we only consider the single crystal test structure the failure happens at the same location at a fixed lifetime for a given stress condition. However, in reality there will be a spread in failure lifetimes for integrated circuit chips even from the same wafer and bimodal and multimodal failure is commonly observed (Ogawa et al Fischer et al 2000;Fischer et al 2001;Baklanov et al 2012). This can be explained by considering the randomness involved in the grain distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we only consider the single crystal test structure the failure happens at the same location at a fixed lifetime for a given stress condition. However, in reality there will be a spread in failure lifetimes for integrated circuit chips even from the same wafer and bimodal and multimodal failure is commonly observed (Ogawa et al Fischer et al 2000;Fischer et al 2001;Baklanov et al 2012). This can be explained by considering the randomness involved in the grain distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A AR/R=20% criterion was used to defme the time to failure. The medium time to failure was determined separately for each mode by fitting the bimodal distribution underlying a weighted supelposition of two lognormal distributions [2]. No significant difference in the activation energy between the two mechanisms was found (Ea=0.83 ... 0.86eV, Fig.3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some via/line EM structures, failure time distributions have been found to severely deviate from ideal linear behavior. Introduction of two bimodal lognormal distributions was needed to obtain a satisfactory fit [5]. These models were 1) the superposition model, where the overall distribution is the sum of two 2-parameter lognormal distributions, (4) and 2) the weakest link (or competing risks) model , (5) where F is the overall CDF, F1 and F2 are the CDF for early mode and late mode, respectively, and p1 is the fraction of the early mode.…”
Section: -Vs 3-parameter Lognormal Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%