2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental demonstration of suppressing residual geometric dephasing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, our approach has the advantages that corrects both amplitude and detuning noise errors while being sufficiently flexible for incorporation into arbitrary gate operations. We also note that in the NMR field, recently a number of methods have been developed to suppress the noises by topological DD method 47 49 , or by eliminating the errors in the synthesizers 50 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our approach has the advantages that corrects both amplitude and detuning noise errors while being sufficiently flexible for incorporation into arbitrary gate operations. We also note that in the NMR field, recently a number of methods have been developed to suppress the noises by topological DD method 47 49 , or by eliminating the errors in the synthesizers 50 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1) for the lack of an analytical solution. It is popular to see the application of the rotating-wave approximation (RWA) in the previous treatments [14,33,34]. With respect to the unitary transformation…”
Section: A More Accurate Effective Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we omitted the contribution up to the second-order of O(Ω 2 R ) and the first-order derivative of the driving parameters with respect to time [14,34] under the assump-…”
Section: A More Accurate Effective Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geometric quantum computation has been originally proposed to accumulate a geometric phase adiabatically, requiring long operation time so that the quantum information can be destructed by decoherence. Thus, nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation aims at shortening the operation time without loss of fidelity, which is experimentally demonstrated [8,[14][15][16][17][18][19] in both Abelian [20][21][22][23] and non-Abelian cases [24,25]. However, the systematic errors induced by inaccurate driving fields harm the performance of geometric gates [26,27], which should be further optimized by quantum control techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%