1984
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1984.10487928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Design: Review and Comment

Abstract: We review major developments in the design of experiments, offer our thoughts on important directions for the future, and make specific recommendations for experimenters and statisticians who are students and teachers of experimental design, practitioners of experimental design, and researchers jointly exploring new frontiers. Specific topics covered are optimal design, computer-aided design, robust design, response surface design, mixture design, factorial design, block design, and designs for nonlinear model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
16

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 213 publications
0
93
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The techniques of experimental design [see Steinberg and Hunter, 1984] have previously been used to design aquifer tests to reliably estimate the physical process parameters defining groundwater flow and contaminant transport [e.g., Nishikawa and Yeh, 1989;McCarthy and Yeh, 1990;Yeh, 1990, 1991]. Of particular interest to the present study is the work of Cleveland and Yeh [1990,1991], who present two ments, the best we can hope to do is define broad ranges for parameters that bracket the likely values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques of experimental design [see Steinberg and Hunter, 1984] have previously been used to design aquifer tests to reliably estimate the physical process parameters defining groundwater flow and contaminant transport [e.g., Nishikawa and Yeh, 1989;McCarthy and Yeh, 1990;Yeh, 1990, 1991]. Of particular interest to the present study is the work of Cleveland and Yeh [1990,1991], who present two ments, the best we can hope to do is define broad ranges for parameters that bracket the likely values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable attention to these issues in the statistics and engineering literatures (e.g., Atkinson & Donev, 1992;Box & Hill, 1967;Ford, Titterington, & Kitsos, 1989;Hill, Hunter, & Wichern, 1968;Steinberg & Hunter, 1984). However, there is very little coverage of the topic in the behavioral sciences, as evidenced by the small number of articles in psychological journals on choosing the best values along a continuum in the pursuit of either of these modeling goals.…”
Section: Theoretical Issues In Model Selection and Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is based on Eq. (19) The system produced by the optimal measurement angles requires no truncation (p = 0) to reconstruct x exact , but due to perturbations induced by numerical precision the systems produced using uniform increments in the -and q-domains require truncation of 8 (p = 8) and 7 (p = 7)…”
Section: Evaluation Of Maels Measurement Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%