1983
DOI: 10.1109/edl.1983.25697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of impact ionization coefficients in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement is made using a CW light source and a noise figure meter such as the Hewlett Packard 8970A. The system has two significant advantages over PSD systems such as those of Bulman (1983) and Li (Lau et al, 2006). Several measurement frequencies are available up to the limit of the circuits or analyser.…”
Section: A Measurement After Xie Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The measurement is made using a CW light source and a noise figure meter such as the Hewlett Packard 8970A. The system has two significant advantages over PSD systems such as those of Bulman (1983) and Li (Lau et al, 2006). Several measurement frequencies are available up to the limit of the circuits or analyser.…”
Section: A Measurement After Xie Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Xie et al (1993) system represents both. Bulman (1983), Ando and Kanbe (1981) and Lau et al (2006) presented systems based on phase sensitive detection. Xie et al (1993) and Toivonen et al (1992) used a DC approach.…”
Section: Measurement Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where N, , ' and N s i represent ionized densities of the deep donors and the deep acceptors, respectively. an and ap are ionization rates for electrons and holes, respectively, and are taken from [8]. Cn and Cp are the electron and hole capture coefficients of the deep levels, respectively, en and ep are the electron and hole emission rates of the deep levels, respectively, and the subscript (SD, SA) represents the corresponding deep level [I].…”
Section: Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this the multiplication within p-i-n APDs, with the same 135 nm intrinsic thickness as our thinnest device, was modelled using the impact ionisation coefficients reported for different III-V materials [11][12][13] . As shown in figure 5, the AlGaAsSb p-i-n APD displays an increased multiplication factor at all reverse biases, compared to GaAs, InP and Al0.8Ga0.2As.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%