2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.1289509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of scanning probe microscope cantilever spring constants utilizing a nanoindentation apparatus

Abstract: A rapid, nondestructive, and accurate method for determining the normal spring constants of scanning probe microscopy cantilevers is presented. Spring constants are determined using a commercial combination atomic force microscope and nanoindentation apparatus configured with a W-indenter tip geometrically configured into either a scanning tunneling microscope pointed tip or chisel shape that may be placed onto the cantilever of interest with high accuracy. A load is applied to the cantilever tip and the corre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acoustic wave causes a known force on the cantilever. Holbery et al [93] use a commercial nanoindenter to measure spring constants of relatively stiff cantilevers. For cantilevers with spring constants above 1 N/m they report an error of less than 10%.…”
Section: Calibration Of Spring Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic wave causes a known force on the cantilever. Holbery et al [93] use a commercial nanoindenter to measure spring constants of relatively stiff cantilevers. For cantilevers with spring constants above 1 N/m they report an error of less than 10%.…”
Section: Calibration Of Spring Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state of the art technique provides approximately 10% accuracy in measuring the normal force constant with a direct method of calibration. 16 The direct method usually employs another lever of known spring constant or a microfabricated array of reference springs ͑MARS͒ for the calibration. 16 In this article, a novel in situ direct method is developed to independently calibrate the lateral force constant.…”
Section: B Difficulties and Limitations In Existing Calibration Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The direct method usually employs another lever of known spring constant or a microfabricated array of reference springs ͑MARS͒ for the calibration. 16 In this article, a novel in situ direct method is developed to independently calibrate the lateral force constant. It correlates the output voltage signals from a PSPD directly to the lateral force applied on the AFM cantilever assembly by a diamagnetic levitation spring system.…”
Section: B Difficulties and Limitations In Existing Calibration Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Some calibration techniques are cumbersome, involving procedures that are comparable in complexity to the experiments that require the calibrated cantilevers. 1,5,11,12 Other techniques require only the measurement of the thermally driven, random vibration of a cantilever and perhaps knowledge of a few of the parameters characterizing the cantilever and its fluid environment. 2,13,14 The majority of the exploration into cantilever calibration techniques has been validated through the comparison of one technique to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%