1977
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112077000135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of the main features of the viscous flow in the wake of a circular cylinder in uniform translation. Part 1. Steady flow

Abstract: A visualization method is used to obtain the main features of the hydrodynamic field for flow past a circular cylinder moving at a uniform speed in a direction perpendicular to its generating lines in a tank filled with a viscous liquid. Photographs are presented to show the particular fineness of the experimental technique. More especially, the closed wake and the velocity distribution behind the obstacle are investigated; the changes in the geometrical parameters describing the eddies with Reynolds number (5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

54
210
7
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
54
210
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation length measured from the rear stagnation point of the cylinder in cylinder diameters, the separation angle which defines the point of separation from the body, and the drag coefficient in each case are also shown in Table 1.They are consistent with the experimental data [15,16] and the computational results listed in [4]. The errors of the separation length and separation angle relative to [16] are 2.35% and 0.37% respectively, and that of the drag coefficient relative to [15] is 2.42%. Moreover, all the errors of the numerical results relative to the experimental data are less than 5%, which demonstrate the reliability of the present method.…”
Section: Low Reynolds Number Flow Over Circular Cylindersupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The separation length measured from the rear stagnation point of the cylinder in cylinder diameters, the separation angle which defines the point of separation from the body, and the drag coefficient in each case are also shown in Table 1.They are consistent with the experimental data [15,16] and the computational results listed in [4]. The errors of the separation length and separation angle relative to [16] are 2.35% and 0.37% respectively, and that of the drag coefficient relative to [15] is 2.42%. Moreover, all the errors of the numerical results relative to the experimental data are less than 5%, which demonstrate the reliability of the present method.…”
Section: Low Reynolds Number Flow Over Circular Cylindersupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The low Reynolds number incompressible flow over a circular cylinder is a benchmark problem for incompressible flows, for which many experimental and computational results can be utilized for comparison [4,15,16]. In this section, the problem is simulated by the algorithm proposed in previous sections.…”
Section: Low Reynolds Number Flow Over Circular Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the next iteration, one makes a correction (Δf x , Δf y ) to the external force to eliminate the discrepancy between the resulting velocity and that from the interpolation procedure (33) and (34), i.e.…”
Section: The Implicit Virtual Boundary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both cases of Re = 20 and Re = 40, there is a stable recirculation zone behind the cylinder that contains a pair of symmetric vortices. To examine the accuracy of the predicted wake structure, the present numerical results for the length of the recirculation zone l/D, distance from the cylinder to the centers of the vortices a/D, the gap between the centers of the vortices b/D, the separation angle θ s , and the drag coefficient C D are compared with that from the existing experimental and numerical studies [33][34][35][36] in Table 1. Good agreements among the results are seen.…”
Section: Uniform Flow Past a Stationary Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…results (Berthelsen and Faltinsen 2008;Russel and Wang 2003;Linnick and Fasel 2005;Herfjord 1996;Calhoun 2002;Medjroubi 2011;Coutanceau and Bouard 1977;Tritton 1959). In order to compare the efficiency of the present method concerning other numerical methods, the average of error in other numerical results is calculated.…”
Section: Algorithm Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%