2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10891-006-0135-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental determination of thermophysical, thermokinetic, and filtration characteristics of peat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon closing the fire pit, the internal fire temperature recorded by the thermocouple was between 110 • C and 260 • C. The surface temperature above the fire was around 35 • C upon closing and increased steadily to ∼70 • C over a period of an hour. This is in line with expected theoretical and experimental values from the literature for heat transfer through peat [9,13,31]. Given that the ambient ground temperature is expected to be 26-33 • , the increase in surface temperature above an underground fire makes it easy to distinguish from the surrounding ground (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon closing the fire pit, the internal fire temperature recorded by the thermocouple was between 110 • C and 260 • C. The surface temperature above the fire was around 35 • C upon closing and increased steadily to ∼70 • C over a period of an hour. This is in line with expected theoretical and experimental values from the literature for heat transfer through peat [9,13,31]. Given that the ambient ground temperature is expected to be 26-33 • , the increase in surface temperature above an underground fire makes it easy to distinguish from the surrounding ground (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Dry peat, even when underground, allows more efficient air flow through than moist peat [5][6][7][8]. If a buried layer of dry peat is ignited it can smoulder slowly underground for long periods of time (from days to years) [8][9][10][11]. Smouldering is a relatively low temperature (500-700 • C compared to 1500-1800 • C for flaming combustion), flameless form of combustion which requires less heat for ignition, less oxygen for sustained burning (10% oxygen concentration for smouldering vs. 16% for flaming), and significantly more water to extinguish (>50% more water per mass of fuel compared to flaming) [8,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies relating to the drying of peat include experimental study of its thermophysical and thermokinetic characteristics. (Grishin et al, 2006) found values of activation energy of 47.376 kJ/mole, and, in an investigation of the thermal analysis and decomposition kinetics of Chinese forest peat, Chen et al (2011) found a value of activation energy of 68.510 kJ/mole. Each type of material has a specific drying curve, which is dependent on the physical and chemical characteristics of the substance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that all the well-known works do not consider a botanical composition of peat to be a factor for penetration of the combustion front in the mass of peat. The influence of the botanical composition on ignition of peat is given in the work (Grishin et al 2006) that provides the results of experiments for determination of the minimum ignition energy, and in the work (Loboda 2012) that provides the results of experimental studies to determine the depth of the combustion front in the peat layer. The samples represented four types of peat with different characteristics (botanical composition, density, humidity content and degree of decomposition).…”
Section: Domingos Xavier Viegas Editor Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%