2000 30th European Microwave Conference 2000
DOI: 10.1109/euma.2000.338758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Development of 2.45GHz Rectenna using FSS and Dual-Polarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [29], a circular polarization patch has one port that is terminated in 50 W, while the other is used for power reception, so the rectifier antenna needs to be configured according to the incoming wave. A crossed dipole is used in [30], with dc outputs connected across the same dc load at the same node.…”
Section: B Dual-polarization Rectenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], a circular polarization patch has one port that is terminated in 50 W, while the other is used for power reception, so the rectifier antenna needs to be configured according to the incoming wave. A crossed dipole is used in [30], with dc outputs connected across the same dc load at the same node.…”
Section: B Dual-polarization Rectenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a dual-orthogonal polarization rectenna, which rectifies the power contained in orthogonally polarized waves independently and adds the dc output, will on average receive the most power with the least variation over time and with increased overall efficiency over a linearly polarized rectenna. This property has been recognized by many of the rectenna designs in the literature, e.g., [15] and [16], and is discussed in detail in [9]. Although there are environments with substantial RF ambient power, in order to reliably power devices, it is useful to additionally have controlled compliant low-power transmitters that operate at frequencies that overlap with the harvesting frequency range.…”
Section: B Rf Harvesting Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only periodic check up of the patient after surgery can be possible in the hospital. No continuous monitoring of the patient and location tracking of the patient can be done [11] [12]. Hence, it leads to increase in the death of the patient after surgery [26].…”
Section: Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%