2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4821950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental estimates of in-plane thermal conductivity in FePt-C granular thin film heat assisted magnetic recording media using a model layered system

Abstract: Cross-plane thermal conductivity kth measurements of vertical stacks of FePt/C were used to estimate the in-plane thermal conductivity of Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR) media that consist of columnar FePt grains segregated by thin C grain boundaries. FePt/C multilayers with varied repeat units and FePt layer thicknesses (chosen to represent HAMR media grain sizes) were measured using Frequency-Domain Thermoreflectance to determine kth in the direction normal to the layers. The data suggest that when F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the granular FePt medium, which consisted of columnar FePt grains segregated by thin C grain boundaries, the in-plane thermal conductivity was below 1 W mK −1 , and the vertical thermal conductivity could be over 10 times the in-plane one, as reported in Ref. 4. As shown in Table I, the in-plane thermal conductivity of the recording layer was fixed at 1 W mK −1 , and the vertical thermal conductivity was changed from 1 to 24 W mK −1 .…”
Section: (A)supporting
confidence: 60%
“…As for the granular FePt medium, which consisted of columnar FePt grains segregated by thin C grain boundaries, the in-plane thermal conductivity was below 1 W mK −1 , and the vertical thermal conductivity could be over 10 times the in-plane one, as reported in Ref. 4. As shown in Table I, the in-plane thermal conductivity of the recording layer was fixed at 1 W mK −1 , and the vertical thermal conductivity was changed from 1 to 24 W mK −1 .…”
Section: (A)supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Our measurement of κ = 8.8 ± 0.6 W m −1 K −1 for the A1 phase at room temperature is consistent with the measurement of an A1 disordered FePt thin film ( κ = 8.5 W m −1 K −1 ) in ref. 10 , where they have used the frequency domain thermoreflectance technique to measure the thermal conductivity. However, our measurement of κ = 11.5 ± 0.8 W m −1 K −1 for the L1 0 phase is slightly lower than that reported in ref.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the possible causes for the grain-to-grain heating variation is grain boundary thickness distribution in the media. Recent experimental studies on modeled FePt-C multilayer film suggests that the thermal resistance of carbon layer sandwiched in between two FePt layers arises from both FePt-C interfaces and the bulk of carbon layer itself [12], [13]. For 1 nm thick carbon layer, 40% of the thermal resistance can be due to the two interfaces.…”
Section: Effect Of Grain Boundary Thickness Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%