2010
DOI: 10.1177/0021998310387667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation and statistical characterization of the strength and strain energy density distribution of Kevlar KM2 yarns: exploring length-scale and weaving effects

Abstract: This article experimentally investigates the tensile strength distributions of 600 den Kevlar KM2 yarns under quasi-static tensile loading. The strength distributions were best characterized using the 3-parameter Weibull and generalized Gamma distributions. In order to assess the effects of weaving on the strength distributions, Kevlar yarns were tested from a spool and then compared to yarns extracted from greige and scoured Kevlar fabrics. The weaving process and treatments caused various levels of strength … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a–c). These same fracture characteristics were observed by Nilakantan et al , Alagar et al , and Valença et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…a–c). These same fracture characteristics were observed by Nilakantan et al , Alagar et al , and Valença et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Before uncrimping starts, the value of k, say k i , is equal to the yarn span. Initial value (before uncrimping) of d, say d i , can be determined from fabric micrograph image as given in [23]. It is to be noted that as centers of fill yarns are not collinear, d cannot be equal to the sum of thicknesses of fill and warp yarns.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nilakantan and his co-workers [30] measured yarn damage due to the weaving process. They found yarns taken from the Hexcel 706 Kevlar KM2 fabrics were weaker than yarns taken from spools.…”
Section: Comparison To Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%