1998
DOI: 10.1109/20.650267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of a roughness model of surface anisotropy in amorphous magnetic ribbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anisotropy constant would be 190 J m Ϫ3 , which is in good agreement with the results obtained in samples of Vitrovac 6150 without the anomalous behavior of the torque. 9 These results confirm that the origin of the decreasing of T u vs H in these kinds of samples in the as-received state is the surface roughness of those samples. The anomalous behavior of the torque is exhibited by those samples whose surface roughness in the longitudinal direction is greater than in the transversal direction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The anisotropy constant would be 190 J m Ϫ3 , which is in good agreement with the results obtained in samples of Vitrovac 6150 without the anomalous behavior of the torque. 9 These results confirm that the origin of the decreasing of T u vs H in these kinds of samples in the as-received state is the surface roughness of those samples. The anomalous behavior of the torque is exhibited by those samples whose surface roughness in the longitudinal direction is greater than in the transversal direction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The directional order gives rise to a magnetic anisotropy in the longitudinal direction of the ribbon. 1 Then the only possible source of an in-plane magnetic anisotropy in the transversal direction of the ribbon is the surface roughness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 Certain samples were cut disk shaped 12 with diameters of 15 mm which allows comparison of the hysteresis loop measurements along different in-plane directions of the disk without the effect of different demagnetizing factors. The magnetic hysteresis loops were obtained by means of a computer controlled inductive measurement system.…”
Section: Samples and Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%