2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of extra-stroke displacement capacity for Curved Surface Slider devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 As part of a comprehensive study on several building typologies and site hazards, Iervolino et al 21 noted that isolated structures may have a worse collapse risk performance than non-isolated structures. These conclusions may be due to a seemingly conservative definition of collapse used for the bearing devices since other research 33 has shown that isolators can generally go far past the collapse displacement used in that previous study. However, more specific research that accounted for the failure mechanism in bearings by Kitayama and Constantinou 30 has also illustrated how minimum code-based designs for seismically isolated buildings in the US can have unacceptable collapse performance at the maximum considered earthquake intensity, which aligns with Iervolino et al 21 Kitayama and Constantinou also show 20 that when examining the isolated structures via a detailed probabilistic assessment, the annual exceedance rates of storey drifts and floor accelerations prior to collapse are still lower than the corresponding non-isolated structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…32 As part of a comprehensive study on several building typologies and site hazards, Iervolino et al 21 noted that isolated structures may have a worse collapse risk performance than non-isolated structures. These conclusions may be due to a seemingly conservative definition of collapse used for the bearing devices since other research 33 has shown that isolators can generally go far past the collapse displacement used in that previous study. However, more specific research that accounted for the failure mechanism in bearings by Kitayama and Constantinou 30 has also illustrated how minimum code-based designs for seismically isolated buildings in the US can have unacceptable collapse performance at the maximum considered earthquake intensity, which aligns with Iervolino et al 21 Kitayama and Constantinou also show 20 that when examining the isolated structures via a detailed probabilistic assessment, the annual exceedance rates of storey drifts and floor accelerations prior to collapse are still lower than the corresponding non-isolated structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Since the overall system is supposed to be subjected to a sever seismic input, and consequently the design displacement of the isolation system is expected to be overcome, the extra-stroke behavior needs to be numerically modeled. Recent research works ( [6], [8]) have shown good agreement between some experimental outcomes pseudo-dynamic tests in extra-stroke range for DCSS devices and possible numerical modeling strategies, namely:…”
Section: Numerical Substructure and Dynamic Systemmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In addition, the sliding surface of the pad has been realized with dimpled recesses, with a light lubrication, in order to achieve the proper design friction coefficient, equal to 3% ( [4]); the corresponding value of applied vertical load is equal to 1500kN.The maximum displacement, given the assumed plan geometric characteristics of sliding surfaces and internal slider, is equal to 172mm. In order to consider a significant extra-stroke displacement demand, the maximum displacement to be considered for the simulation, which will define the proper scaling of the input signal, is defined according to the design value, increased by 50% of the sliding pad diameter, so that 25% of the pad is uncovered by each sliding surface ( [6]). Thus, a maximum displacement of 350mm has been considered.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Physical Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exceedance of an isolator displacement corresponding to 90% of the isolator displacement capacity d=150mm was chosen to quantify the occurrence of damage in the seismic isolation system. Furinghetti et al [5] have experimentally evaluated and determined the extrastroke displacement capacity of curved surface slider devices, which is limited by the maximum contact pressure that can be tolerated by the installed sliding material. This extra-stroke displacement capacity was not considered in this study, but it can be further investigated by future studies on the same topic.…”
Section: Damage Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, seismically isolated structures can be subjected to inelastic behavior and damage, when they are excited by earthquake ground motion with intensities exceeding the design seismic hazard level. Furthermore, seismically isolated structures can manifest inelastic behavior even for ground motion intensities corresponding to the design hazard level, when they are unintentionally constructed with lower strength than the value prescribed by the code provisions [4][5][6][7]. The investigation of such behavior of existing seismically isolated structures sheds light on their reliability and robustness compared to fixed-based structures, as defined by Castaldo et al [8,9], Tsang [10] and Peng et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%