2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of permeable cable-supported façades subjected to wind and earthquake loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the acquired results of the proposed DSF with others obtained from similar constructive solutions, such as the one analysed by Reyes et al [7], in the present case study and experimental wind assessment the full-scale sample was subjected to a maximum pressure up to 3200 Pa, obtaining a maximum relative displacement of 56.43 mm with 14.20 mm of permanent deformation; in the same test, Reyes et al exposed the outer layer of their ventilated façade case study to a pressure of 1590 Pa, obtaining a maximum mid-height relative displacement of 198 mm, with 87 mm of permanent deformation. For both case studies, when exposed to wind loads, it was proved the high adaptability of flexible DSF systems and the progressive distention of the cables when the lateral load increased; nevertheless, only local damages was evidenced at the end of the tests.…”
Section: Discussion Overviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing the acquired results of the proposed DSF with others obtained from similar constructive solutions, such as the one analysed by Reyes et al [7], in the present case study and experimental wind assessment the full-scale sample was subjected to a maximum pressure up to 3200 Pa, obtaining a maximum relative displacement of 56.43 mm with 14.20 mm of permanent deformation; in the same test, Reyes et al exposed the outer layer of their ventilated façade case study to a pressure of 1590 Pa, obtaining a maximum mid-height relative displacement of 198 mm, with 87 mm of permanent deformation. For both case studies, when exposed to wind loads, it was proved the high adaptability of flexible DSF systems and the progressive distention of the cables when the lateral load increased; nevertheless, only local damages was evidenced at the end of the tests.…”
Section: Discussion Overviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for designing effective and sustainable façade systems. A recent alternative for DSFs involves the use of flexible elements to support the external cladding components [7]. This variant introduces an innovative approach to the traditional construction method, offering distinct advantages, among which are: adaptability, given that flexible elements can accommodate irregularities in the building's structure, allowing for more versatile and creative designs [8]; a better dynamic response (since the flexibility of these elements enables the cladding system to adapt to external forces, such as wind loads or seismic activity, without compromising its integrity [9][10][11][12]; and, often, an enhanced insulation, because by incorporating flexible elements, the insulation properties of the cladding system can be improved, further enhancing the building's energy efficiency [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation