1962
DOI: 10.2172/4759582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation of the Fallout Radiation Protection Provided by Selected Structures in the Los Angeles Area

Abstract: This report is published in the interest of providing information which may prove of value to the reader in his study of effectsdata derived principallyfrom nuclear weapons tests and from experiments designed to duplicate various characteristics of nuclear weapons. This document is based on information available a t the time of preparation which may have subsequently been expanded and re-evaluated. Also, in preparing this report for publication, some classified material may have been removed. Users are caution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this investigation were found to be in agreement with a variety of large scale experiments preformed with both the tube and source method and Mobile Radiological Measuring Unit (MRMU) during the, 1960s, and 1970s (Strickler and Auxier 1960, Borella and Burson 1961, Burson 1962, 1963. This MRMU employed a single moving radioactive Co 60 source hydraulically pumped through polyethylene tubing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The results of this investigation were found to be in agreement with a variety of large scale experiments preformed with both the tube and source method and Mobile Radiological Measuring Unit (MRMU) during the, 1960s, and 1970s (Strickler and Auxier 1960, Borella and Burson 1961, Burson 1962, 1963. This MRMU employed a single moving radioactive Co 60 source hydraulically pumped through polyethylene tubing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A collection of lightweight, in-use, single family residences (80 to 250 m 2 footprint) were studied using Co-60 roof and ground sources [46], [47]. The exterior wall material ranged from wood siding, Cemesto panels (Figure B10), stucco, and concrete block.…”
Section: Single Family Residencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Building protection can vary considerably from building to building, at different locations within a given building, and at different times from detonation [1]. For example, single story, lightly constructed buildings such as wood or vinyl sided frame homes, offer limited protection (PF ≈ 2 to 3); e.g., [25], [26]; whereas the inner portions of large, multi-story concrete or masonry office buildings can offer excellent protection (PF > 100); e.g. [27], [28].…”
Section: Location Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, single story, lightly constructed buildings such as wood or vinyl sided frame homes, offer limited protection (PF ≈ 2 to 3); e.g., [25], [26]; whereas the inner portions of large, multi-story concrete or masonry office buildings can offer excellent protection (PF > 100); e.g. [27], [28]. Basements, in general, offer adequate or better protection (PF ≥ 10), e.g.…”
Section: Location Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%