2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/indin41052.2019.8972066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation on NB-IoT and LoRaWAN for Industrial and IoT Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we use the NB-IoT protocol for our communication link and leverage its advantages over LoRaWAN [22]: NB-IoT uses a licensed band, so there is no limitation on band occupation; moreover, there is no need of gateways because the node connects directly with mobile operator's base stations. Note that, LoRaWAN protocol is generally less energy consuming than NB-IoT [10] at low datarates, but it is not adequate for high datarate SHM applications that need thousand of KBytes of data transferred. The NB-IoT payload is 3 times bigger than LoRaWAN (1500 Bytes against 300 Bytes in specific condition); furthermore, NB-IoT datarate is 200 kbps against 50 kbps of LoRaWAN [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we use the NB-IoT protocol for our communication link and leverage its advantages over LoRaWAN [22]: NB-IoT uses a licensed band, so there is no limitation on band occupation; moreover, there is no need of gateways because the node connects directly with mobile operator's base stations. Note that, LoRaWAN protocol is generally less energy consuming than NB-IoT [10] at low datarates, but it is not adequate for high datarate SHM applications that need thousand of KBytes of data transferred. The NB-IoT payload is 3 times bigger than LoRaWAN (1500 Bytes against 300 Bytes in specific condition); furthermore, NB-IoT datarate is 200 kbps against 50 kbps of LoRaWAN [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, such sensors are also suitable for short-term structural monitoring applications, exploiting single clusters of devices for multiple buildings. Previous works have pointed out that, concerning power consumption, coverage, and security, LoRaWAN [9] and NB-IoT [10], [11] are the most suited LPWAN protocols in distributed IoT applications. In addition to the installation, the second limiting factor comes from transducers [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons between NB-IoT and other LPWAN have been carried out to evaluate some features. These features include the cost of deployment, coverage range, interference immunity, power, and spectral efficiencies [ 6 , 7 , 16 , 81 , 82 ]. However, the results obtained showed that these technologies have some distinctive features that are suitable for specific purposes or applications.…”
Section: Technical Background Of Nb-iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we use the NB-IoT protocol for our communication link and leverage its advantages over LoRaWAN [20]: NB-IoT uses a licensed band, so there is no limitation on band occupation; moreover, there is no need of gateways because the node connects directly with mobile operator's base stations. Note that, LoRaWAN protocol is generally less energy consuming than NB-IoT [8] at low datarates, but it is not adequate for high datarate SHM applications that need thousand of KBytes of data transferred. The NB-IoT payload is 3 times bigger than LoRaWAN (1500 Bytes against 300 Bytes in specific condition); furthermore, NB-IoT datarate is 200 kbps against 50 kbps of LoRaWAN [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, such sensors are also suitable for short-term structural monitoring applications, exploiting single clusters of devices for multiple buildings. Previous works have pointed out that, concerning power consumption, coverage, and security, LoRaWAN [7] and NB-IoT [8], [9] are the most suited LPWAN protocols in distributed IoT applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%