2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence for fundamental, and not realized, niche partitioning in a plant–herbivore community interaction network

Abstract: Summary1. Patterns of niche partitioning can result from local ecological interactions (e.g. interspecific competition) occurring within a contemporary time frame (realized niche partitioning). Alternatively, they may represent the end product of historical processes acting over long time frames (fundamental niche partitioning). 2. Niche partitioning is often detected by analysing patterns of resource use within communities, but experiments are rarely conducted to test whether patterns of non-overlapping resou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the fact that the relationship holds across communities with very similar climates, and after accounting for the influence of post-fire vegetation age, elevation, and other aspects of vegetation structure, suggests that it likely arises as a result of specialisation of restio associated insects at taxonomic levels below the plant family level. This mechanism is supported by studies of host-use and preference in restio associated leafhoppers [19,41]. Our results are also similar to those of the handful of other studies in the CFR which have investigated plant-insect diversity linkage, but have sampled across whole plant communities [27,28,30,43], perhaps suggesting that narrow specialisation might be widespread in herbivorous CFR insects.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, the fact that the relationship holds across communities with very similar climates, and after accounting for the influence of post-fire vegetation age, elevation, and other aspects of vegetation structure, suggests that it likely arises as a result of specialisation of restio associated insects at taxonomic levels below the plant family level. This mechanism is supported by studies of host-use and preference in restio associated leafhoppers [19,41]. Our results are also similar to those of the handful of other studies in the CFR which have investigated plant-insect diversity linkage, but have sampled across whole plant communities [27,28,30,43], perhaps suggesting that narrow specialisation might be widespread in herbivorous CFR insects.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Alternately, insects may be specialised on a plant species and only be present in the community when nutrient uptake from that plant species is optimal. Leafhopper species in the tribe Cephalelini (Cicadellidae) have been shown to be specialised on Restionaceae taxa [19,39–41], whereas Betiscoides grasshoppers are specialised on the Restionaceae at the family level [42]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another divergent selection pressure that might cause immigrant inviability is plant physiology. We previously showed that C. uncinatus adults using H. aristatus have reduced survival on Elegia filacea , a lower ranking host species [41]. It is therefore conceivable that reproductive isolation is, in addition to e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. uncinatus uses several genera of restios from the Willdenowieae sub tribe, as well as several species in the genus Elegia which belongs to the Restioneae sub tribe [39]. Augustyn et al [41] demonstrated experimentally that C. uncinatus from a single site actively chooses its predominant field host and also survives better on it than on unused restio species. As experiments were performed in the absence of predators, the authors suggest that preference is linked to performance through plant chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation