Objectives-To examine the level of awareness of radon issues, correlates of elective testing behaviors, and the accuracy of risk perception for radon exposures among rural residents receiving public health services.Design-A cross-sectional design was used in which questionnaire data and household analytic data for radon levels were collected from a nonprobabilistic sample of rural households.Sample-Thirty-one rural households with 71 adults and 60 children participated in the study. Primary household respondents were female (100%), Caucasian (97%), and primarily (94%) between 21 and 40 years of age.Measurement-Questionnaire data consisted of knowledge and risk perception items about radon and all homes were tested for the presence of radon.Results-The prevalence of high airborne radon (defined as ≥ 4pCi/l) was 32%. More than a third of the sample underestimated the seriousness of health effects of radon exposure, 39% disagreed that being around less radon would improve the long-term health of their children, and 52% were unsure whether radon could cause health problems. After adjusting for chance, only 21% of the subjects correctly understood their risk status.Conclusions-This study provides preliminary evidence that low-income rural citizens do not understand their risk of radon exposure or the deleterious consequences of exposure.
HHS Public Access
Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript
Children at RiskThe objective of this article is to explore the level of knowledge and awareness of radon issues among rural residents receiving public health services to better understand the context of rural children's household exposures to radon. Additionally, correlates of elective radon testing behaviors and accuracy of risk perceptions among caretakers (i.e., parents, guardians, grandparents, etc.) of children are explored.As a vulnerable population, children may experience especially potent exposures to environmental toxins such as heavy metals like lead and mercury, pesticides, and air contaminants such as passive cigarette smoke, molds, and radon. Because children possess different physiologic, behavioral, and biologic capacities than adults, health risks resulting from exposure may be more severe (Dunn, Burns, & Sattler, 2003). Although children share the same routes of exposure with adults, children are at a distinct disadvantage for health consequences from environmental exposures (Schneider & Freeman, 2000). When adjusted for size, children have a greater body surface area, breathe more air, consume more food and fluids, and metabolize toxins differently than adults. In addition, developmental behaviors such as placing unclean objects in their mouths, spending large amounts of time on floor surfaces, or being held in close proximity to lit cigarettes place children at additional risk for exposures to environmental toxins.Awareness of the importance of examining residential characteristics when considering children's exposures to environmental toxins is increasing. Because A...