2019
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence for the role of sexual selection in the evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in the dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus

Abstract: A role for sexual selection in the evolution of insect cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) is suggested by observations of selection acting on male CHCs during female mate choice. However, evidence that CHCs evolve in response to sexual selection is generally lacking, and there is a need to extend our understanding beyond well‐studied taxa. Experimental evolution offers a powerful approach to investigate the effect of sexual selection on the evolution of insect CHCs. We conducted such an experiment using the dung be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evolutionary genetic studies on CHC biosynthesis also need to account for sex-specific differences in the regulation of CHC biosynthesis (e.g., Foley et al 2007;Dembeck et al 2015;Luo et al 2019). Despite sharing the same genes in principle, sexes can show pronounced differences in their CHC profiles, qualitatively as well as quantitatively (e.g., Buellesbach et al 2013;Berdan et al 2019;Berson et al 2019a). As has already been demonstrated, numerous CHC biosynthesis genes seem to show a strong expression bias in one particular sex with a pronounced sex-specific impact on the respective CHC profile (Chertemps et al 2006(Chertemps et al , 2007Dembeck et al 2015, see Table 1 and S1).…”
Section: Sex-specificity and Gene Expression Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary genetic studies on CHC biosynthesis also need to account for sex-specific differences in the regulation of CHC biosynthesis (e.g., Foley et al 2007;Dembeck et al 2015;Luo et al 2019). Despite sharing the same genes in principle, sexes can show pronounced differences in their CHC profiles, qualitatively as well as quantitatively (e.g., Buellesbach et al 2013;Berdan et al 2019;Berson et al 2019a). As has already been demonstrated, numerous CHC biosynthesis genes seem to show a strong expression bias in one particular sex with a pronounced sex-specific impact on the respective CHC profile (Chertemps et al 2006(Chertemps et al , 2007Dembeck et al 2015, see Table 1 and S1).…”
Section: Sex-specificity and Gene Expression Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many insects, CHCs have been co-opted to serve as chemical signals (pheromones) that mediate intraspecific communication [19,20]. Sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbon (SDCHC) profiles are widespread in insects [21][22][23], but the regulatory networks that underlie the formation of SDCHCs largely remain unknown. Considerable progress has been made toward understanding the genetic basis of hydrocarbon (HC) biosynthesis and CHC variation in insects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of Obp56h and CG10514 are correlated with the production of CHCs that are involved in social behavior in D. melanogaster (Shorter et al 2016) and Drosophila serrata (McGraw et al 2011), respectively. CHCs are often under strong sexual selection across insect systems, with individual or combinations of CHCs serving as important mating cues (Thomas and Simmons 2009,Berson et al 2019a, b). The correlation of these genes with CHC profiles in Drosophila provides additional evidence that Obp56h expression, and the house fly co-expression module more generally, are related to male mating behavior, and possibly under sexual selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%