The experimental confirmation of Landau damping in a one-dimensional ptusma or electron beam requires the measurement of the velocity dist.ribution. the wave amplitude as a function of time or space, and the numerical solution of t.he Volterra integral equation. through which these data ure theoretically related. It is shown that the errors inherent in the two measurements arc, under the best of circumstances, of such magnitude that it is not possible to adduce a damping law. The analysis is devoted for the most part to the spatial damping on an electron beam, and a t-ypical nurnerieal example is given. § 1. INTRODUCTlON FOR the past two decades the problem of Landau damping (Landau 1946) of plane waves in a plasma has been the subject of many technical papers. With few exceptions, the discussion of this problem has been theoretical, and there is a great paucity of experimental confirmation. Perhaps the most important single result of the theory is the conclusion that Landau damping occurs under certain conditions so that thc propagation of longitudinal waves in a warm plasma approximation is approached. The more detailed results of the theory, including the exact rate of damping, are not easily accessible to experimental observation, particularly if the initial distribution in velocity space is not Maxwellian. This paper considers the problem of experimental confirmation of the Landau theory for a non-Maxwellian initial distribution. Parts of the problem arc (i) the experimental determination of the velocity distribution, (ii) the computation of the electric field from these experimental data, (iii) the inference of a damping law from measurements of the electric field, and (iv) the significance of a comparison between theory and experiment.As subsequently established, the theory of signal evanescence on a polychromatic electron beam (Berghammer 1962) is formally equivalent to the theory of the propagation of a longitudinal plane wave in a warm plasma. Although there are physical differences in so far as different phenomena have been omitted from the theory in the two cases, these are t Communicated by the Author.
If)