1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.70.418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence of the asymmetry of the soft electron peak in ion-atom ionization

Abstract: We have measured the doubly differential energy and angular distribution of low-energy electrons emitted in collisions of H + and 3 He 2+ on Ne at 106 keV/u. In this way, we are able to obtain information about the shape of the soft electron ionization peak. Against current belief, but in accordance with a two-Coulomb-center interaction of the emitted electron, we find it to be strongly asymmetric in the forward-backward direction. We discuss the shape of the cross section and introduce a parametric expression… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the soft collision, two center effect, binary encounter and electron capture in continuum [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Since the two indistinguishable H-atoms may be termed as a coherent source of electrons in a large impact parameter collision with a fast projectile, their contributions to the ionization add coherently and an interference effect may be expected and has been observed [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the soft collision, two center effect, binary encounter and electron capture in continuum [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Since the two indistinguishable H-atoms may be termed as a coherent source of electrons in a large impact parameter collision with a fast projectile, their contributions to the ionization add coherently and an interference effect may be expected and has been observed [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have now demonstrated [41] an independent way of obtaining the interference structure by using the forward backward asymmetry parameter of electron DDCS which is independent of the theoretical model calculations and does not require a complementary experiment with atomic H. The experiments with atomic H as a target become difficult owing to the involved procedure of production of atomic H from the dissociation of H 2 . It is known that a large forward backward angular asymmetry is mainly caused by the two-center mechanism in heavy ion collisions [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The enhancement in the forward directions and depletion in the backward angles is caused by the long range post collisional interaction among the three particles in the continuum (electron-projectile ion-recoil ion) of the final states and qualitatively explained by the continuum distorted wave models such as CDW-EIS (eikonal initial state), at least for an atomic target like He [5][6][7] or H [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) persists. Measurements of the SE peak shape are much more difficult than those of the ELC cusp shape because the energy of the electrons is in the eV region only (as compared to hundreds of eV for the ELC cusp), which requires extremely thin targets [3,30]. Fig.…”
Section: The Soft Electron Peakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These electrons are caused by direct interaction with the projectile and populate the low continuum states of the target. Conventionally, the first-order Born approximation for direct ionisation [2] has been used for their description, but the new experimental discovery of the peak asymmetry [3] caused by a strong interaction with the projectile field, calls for an improved theoretical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional picture contains three main features of the ionization cross section ds͞d 3 v e . They are the binary encounter (BE) sphere [2] which can be produced by target or projectile ionization, and two sharp peaks which may appear, one centered in velocity space at the origin [3] and the other at the velocity v p of the incident projectile [4][5][6][7]. These structures are closely related to two-body interactions of the ejected electron with the target and the projectile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%