2016
DOI: 10.18235/0000252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evidence on Credit Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark. This argument follows an idea by Bando and Mabuchi in [1] to prove uniqueness of Kähler-Einstein metrics and it may be illuminating to compare the arguments. Bando and Mabuchi consider another perturbation defined by Aubin's continuity method which applies when [ω] = c 1 (X) and can be written…”
Section: Uniqueness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark. This argument follows an idea by Bando and Mabuchi in [1] to prove uniqueness of Kähler-Einstein metrics and it may be illuminating to compare the arguments. Bando and Mabuchi consider another perturbation defined by Aubin's continuity method which applies when [ω] = c 1 (X) and can be written…”
Section: Uniqueness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the case when [ω] = c 1 (X) this result is due to Bando-Mabuchi [1] while the case [ω] = c 1 (L) with Aut 0 (X) trivial was shown by Donaldson [27], using approximation with so called balanced metrics attached to high tensor powers of the line bundle L. The general uniqueness result appears in [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%