2020
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00352-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evolution In Vivo To Identify Selective Pressures during Pneumococcal Colonization

Abstract: Experimental evolution is a powerful technique to understand how populations evolve from selective pressures imparted by the surrounding environment. With the advancement of whole-population genomic sequencing, it is possible to identify and track multiple contending genotypes associated with adaptations to specific selective pressures. This approach has been used repeatedly with model species in vitro, but only rarely in vivo. Herein we report results of replicate experimentally evolved populations of Strepto… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutants lacking the dltB gene (SP_2175) were shown by Cooper et al ( 43 ) to be selected for during in vivo experimental evolution during colonization, probably because the authors removed the transmission bottleneck by performing multiple experimental passages. Cooper et al hypothesized that the dlt locus was maintained across the pneumococcal population because it is required for transmission to new hosts despite increased adhesion and colonization when the locus was deleted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutants lacking the dltB gene (SP_2175) were shown by Cooper et al ( 43 ) to be selected for during in vivo experimental evolution during colonization, probably because the authors removed the transmission bottleneck by performing multiple experimental passages. Cooper et al hypothesized that the dlt locus was maintained across the pneumococcal population because it is required for transmission to new hosts despite increased adhesion and colonization when the locus was deleted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evolution is a powerful tool for identification of genetic elements under selection within different environments 4 . Cooper and colleagues recently showed the value of this approach for Streptococcus pneumoniae in mouse models, using a nasopharyngeal colonisation model similar to that described here, but using a 19F pneumococcal strain (BHN97x) 29 . There are some interesting commonalities in the findings of the two studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Relaxing selection for transmission, however, selects for within-host fitness without consideration for transmissibility. Serial passage experiments in mice, for example, have resulted in the inactivation of genes that promote transmission at the expense of within-host fitness, such as dltB in S. pneumoniae [30], or selected for accelerated growth in Plasmodium chabaudi [31, 32]. Analogous dlt inactivation and evolution of more virulent Plasmodium knowlesi parasites have also been observed during human infections, suggesting that within-host adaptation has important consequences for disease severity and warranting further study of how transmission affects the rate of such adaptation [11, 33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance between transmissibility and within-host fitness parallels an invasion-persistence trade-off in other organisms—some genotypes may more readily disperse and colonize new hosts/territories, but are less persistent and thus fare poorly when present in the same environment as less dispersable but more competitive genotypes. This trade-off is evident in several S. pneumoniae genes, such as toxin pneumolysin [40, 41], capsule serotype (for example, serotype 4 compared to 23F) [40, 42], and the aforementioned dltB [30, 43], which promote transmissibility at the expense of within-host fitness. Whether these genes are favored by selection and maintained depends on the relative importance of transmissibility and within-host fitness, as shown by the loss of dltB in serial passage where transmission is more certain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%