1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.81.3797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Features of Self-Organization in Traffic Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
439
2
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 524 publications
(469 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
25
439
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the jam size increases with the distance upstream from the bottleneck. Again, this is in agreement with real observations on highway traffic [15].…”
Section: Reaction Time In a Vehicular Traffic Modelsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As a consequence, the jam size increases with the distance upstream from the bottleneck. Again, this is in agreement with real observations on highway traffic [15].…”
Section: Reaction Time In a Vehicular Traffic Modelsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, although this second argument can explain occurrences of capacity drops in a fundamental diagram, it does not in our view explain the capacity drop from Kerner andRehborn (1996a, p. R1300), which gives a more complete spatio-temporal picture, and where the flow into the jam is clearly larger than the flow out of the jam.…”
Section: Some Empirical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Often it is better to plot density , flow q, and velocity v as functions of time ( Figure 2). These measurements show that the typical transition is from the free-flow regime to a regime where throughput is virtually undiminished but densities are much higher, meaning much lower velocities (Mika et al 1969, Kerner and Rehborn 1996b, Kerner 1998. In Figure 1, this corresponds to a transition from the "free" branch around = 25 veh/km to values on the data cloud marked "congested" around = 40 veh/km.…”
Section: Some Empirical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations