1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(78)80054-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental fractures of monkey mandibles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
46
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mandibular angle region with an unerupted third molar is an area of lowered resistance to external forces 9 . This observation has also been confirmed by experimental studies on monkey mandibles 14 . REITZIK et al 14 have showed that the mandible with unerupted third molars required 40% less force to be fractured than the mandible with fully erupted third molars, and they suggested that the unerupted third molars could weaken the mandible because the tooth occupied more of the osseous space.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The mandibular angle region with an unerupted third molar is an area of lowered resistance to external forces 9 . This observation has also been confirmed by experimental studies on monkey mandibles 14 . REITZIK et al 14 have showed that the mandible with unerupted third molars required 40% less force to be fractured than the mandible with fully erupted third molars, and they suggested that the unerupted third molars could weaken the mandible because the tooth occupied more of the osseous space.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The most important factor to indicate the presence of M3 is the reduced amount of bone at the angle, and this hypothesis is supported by the study of Reitzik et al [19]. They showed that the mandibles containing incompletely erupted M3 fractured at approximately 60 % of the force required to fracture the mandibles containing fully erupted M3 by using the dry isolated vervet monkey mandible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Hierbei ist jedoch zum einen keine kontrollierte Frakturlokalisation möglich, zum andern kommt es durch die Art der Fixierung häufig zu Kombinationsfrakturen, deren osteosynthetische Versorgung durch Erhö-hung der Einfluss nehmenden Variablen nicht reproduzierbar messbar ist. Auch die von Reitzik et al [27] beschriebene Frakturerzeugung durch Fixierung von Unterkieferhälften in einer Zugapplikationsmaschine scheint nicht praktikabel, da in der vorliegenden Studie gesamte Unterkieferpräparate definiert und reproduzierbar frakturiert werden müssen.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified