2014
DOI: 10.1364/josab.31.000a51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental generation of an optical field with arbitrary spatial coherence properties

Abstract: We describe an experimental technique to generate a quasi-monochromatic field with any arbitrary spatial coherence properties that can be described by the cross-spectral density function, W (r 1 , r 2 ). This is done by using a dynamic binary amplitude grating generated by a digital micromirror device (DMD) to rapidly alternate between a set of coherent fields, creating an incoherent mix of modes that represent the coherent mode decomposition of the desired W (r 1 , r 2 ). This method was then demonstrated exp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the physical meaning of the above expansion is that a partially coherent source can be thought of as the superposition of a set of mutually uncorrelated, perfectly coherent, and suitably weighted fields. Of course, this also represents a way to physically synthesize partially coherent source [19,22,23,26,40,63], especially when they are not of the Schell-model type [6,44,45]. The superposition usually involves an infinite number of coherent fields but for practical applications a finite number is often enough for a good representation of the CSD function [27,44].…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the physical meaning of the above expansion is that a partially coherent source can be thought of as the superposition of a set of mutually uncorrelated, perfectly coherent, and suitably weighted fields. Of course, this also represents a way to physically synthesize partially coherent source [19,22,23,26,40,63], especially when they are not of the Schell-model type [6,44,45]. The superposition usually involves an infinite number of coherent fields but for practical applications a finite number is often enough for a good representation of the CSD function [27,44].…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a Laguerre-Gaussian intensity at the source plane is considered (see Equation (9)), a pseudo-modal expansion [27] of the CSD has been found. Then, these kinds of sources can be synthesized by superposing a large enough number of pseudo-modes [32,33]. Peculiar behavior of the intensity profile with the propagation distance has been found: the profile becomes sharper and the maximum intensity is reached after a propagation distance from the source plane, the latter corresponding to the waist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for values of the ratio δ c /w 0 lower than, approximately, 1 (2) for m = 0 (m = 1), the first pseudo-eigenvalue is not the highest one, and the contribution of higher-order modes becomes more and more significant for decreasing values of δ c /w 0 . From Figures 3 and 4, it can be concluded that the proposed pseudo-Schell model sources with circular coherence (Equations (3) and (7)) can be synthesized (with the desired precision) just by superposing a sufficiently large number of pseudo-modes with appropriate weights [32,33].…”
Section: Source Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the condition of a switching time τs much faster than the integration time τi of the detector must be fulfilled. Additionally, to ensure a stochastic superposition, avoiding time correlation between states, switching time must be larger than the coherence time τc of the light source [21]. These sampling conditions can be summarized as…”
Section: Spatial Coherence Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, DMDs have been applied for modulating spatial coherence by means of the superposition of optical modes generated by binary phase and amplitude holograms [21]. However, there was no measurement of spatial coherence or any property to distinguish between the blurring due to spatial coherence from the blurring produced in the holographic reconstruction of a blur object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%