2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental identification of the behaviour of and lateral forces from freely-walking pedestrians on laterally oscillating structures in a virtual reality environment

Abstract: HighlightsA novel setup for investigating pedestrian–structure interaction is presented.Foot-placement is the main balance control mechanism on laterally vibrating ground.All components of pedestrian force are uncovered, including self-excited forces.Inverted pendulum pedestrian model qualitatively captures the nature of forces.The ground and visual conditions cause significant changes in pedestrian loading.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(53 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, under the IPM framework proposed by Macdonald, Carroll et al [28,29] rebuilt the experimental setup developed by Pizzimenti and Ricciardelli [22] and then utilized 3D motion capture equipment to analyze the features of the self-excited force caused by humanstructure interaction. Similarly, Bocian et al [30] conducted a treadmill test based on the IPM framework by using an interactive virtual reality technology to avoid the implications of artificiality and allow for unconstrained gait in the laboratory environment. The main conclusions obtained from the laboratory tests are as follows: the velocity proportional load (or the equivalent negative damping) could be generated even though pedestrian lateral walking frequency differs from that of the bridge (i.e., synchronization is not necessary for a large vibration of footbridge); and the large vibration will be triggered when the equivalent negative damping is equal to the inherent bridge damping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, under the IPM framework proposed by Macdonald, Carroll et al [28,29] rebuilt the experimental setup developed by Pizzimenti and Ricciardelli [22] and then utilized 3D motion capture equipment to analyze the features of the self-excited force caused by humanstructure interaction. Similarly, Bocian et al [30] conducted a treadmill test based on the IPM framework by using an interactive virtual reality technology to avoid the implications of artificiality and allow for unconstrained gait in the laboratory environment. The main conclusions obtained from the laboratory tests are as follows: the velocity proportional load (or the equivalent negative damping) could be generated even though pedestrian lateral walking frequency differs from that of the bridge (i.e., synchronization is not necessary for a large vibration of footbridge); and the large vibration will be triggered when the equivalent negative damping is equal to the inherent bridge damping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once these discrete representative points have been determined, the velocity process of _ q(θ, t) can be obtained by the deterministic solution of equation (7). Afterwards, p i (q, θ i , t) can also be obtained according to equation (14), and equation (16) will be changed to…”
Section: Establishing the Pde For Lateral Vibration Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, on the basis of the inverted pendulum model proposed by Macdonald, Carroll et al [13,14] repeated the treadmill experiment of Ricciardelli and Pizzimenti [15] by using a 3D human motion capture technology and analyzed the pedestrian selfexcitation characteristics caused by the pedestrian-structure interaction. Similarly, Bocian et al [16], also based on the inverted pendulum model, carried out an experiment of pedestrian walking on the treadmill. e experiment was characterized by using a virtual reality simulation technology to reproduce the actual surrounding environment of pedestrians walking to reduce the influence of indoor environment on pedestrian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e key reasons for this are (1) the lack of adequate and accurate design procedures in contemporary design guidelines [6], (2) a lack of appreciation of the importance of vibration serviceability design dominance relative to other design parameters, such as strength and deflections, (3) the lack of a probabilistic modelling strategy to account for variability of excitation source and hence representative footfall loading model [7], and (4) the lack of appropriate assessment criteria for subjective human perception [6,8]. ese, by nature, lead to a major challenge in modern floor design, whereby the prediction of vibration responses under human-induced footfall remains demanding and uncertain [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%