2016
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Implementation of New Sliding Mode Control Law applied To a DC–DC Boost Converter

Abstract: The real implementation of sliding mode controllers (SMCs) to a DC-DC boost converter is a challenge due to the nonminimum phase behavior of these kinds of converters and the SMCs chattering problem. In this paper, new integral sliding mode control laws with linear and proposed nonlinear sliding surfaces are developed to overcome these problems. An experimental comparative study between these SMCs and the classical SMC applied for a DC-DC boost converter is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the control of these converters in the face of classical loads is well-understood, in some modern applications the loads do not behave like standard passive impedances, instead they are more accurately represented as constant power loads (CPLs), which correspond to first-third quadrant hyperbolas in the loads voltage-current plane. This scenario significantly differs from the classical one and poses a new challenge to control theorist, see [2][3][4]7,10,15] for further discussion on the topic and [20] for a recent review of the literature. It should be underscored that the typical application of this device requires large variations of the operating point-therefore, the dynamic description of its behavior cannot be captured by a linearized model, requiring instead a nonlinear one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the control of these converters in the face of classical loads is well-understood, in some modern applications the loads do not behave like standard passive impedances, instead they are more accurately represented as constant power loads (CPLs), which correspond to first-third quadrant hyperbolas in the loads voltage-current plane. This scenario significantly differs from the classical one and poses a new challenge to control theorist, see [2][3][4]7,10,15] for further discussion on the topic and [20] for a recent review of the literature. It should be underscored that the typical application of this device requires large variations of the operating point-therefore, the dynamic description of its behavior cannot be captured by a linearized model, requiring instead a nonlinear one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For boost converter V out > V in and hence (23) and (26) are easily satisfied by appropriate selection of k 1 and k 2 .…”
Section: Stability Of the Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, Equations (8) and (9) are the translational dynamic and rotational dynamic of the quadrotor UAV, respectively [22].…”
Section: Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%