2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation and CFD modelling of flow, sedimentation, and solids separation in a combined sewer detention tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass percentage and the height of deposit in a combined sewer detention tank were successfully estimated by three‐dimensional CFD simulation (Dufresne et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mass percentage and the height of deposit in a combined sewer detention tank were successfully estimated by three‐dimensional CFD simulation (Dufresne et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Dufresne et al [17] showed experimentally that particles deposits in the central zone of a sedimentation tank are regularly resuspended but cannot escape because they are jailed by the vortices inside the tank. This phenomenon is confirmed by our numerical experiments, where turbulence generated near the bottoms is holding the particles.…”
Section: Baffle Numbersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dynamic of the transport and transformation process occurring in CSO chambers is also seen to be a very important aspect of their design and operation, and is particularly significant for the larger interceptor sewer systems. A number of studies have been conducted on hydraulic performance and/or sediment retention efficiency of CSO chambers by physical laboratory modelling and computational fluid dynamics modelling (Dufresne et al, 2009;Harwood and Saul, 2001;Stovin and Saul, 2000). However, sewer sediment phenomena are not well understood, and as a consequence current sediment transport modelling techniques can provide predictions that are significantly different from observations (Ashley et al, 2004;De Sutter et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%