2019
DOI: 10.14311/app.2019.25.0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation and Simulation of 3d-Printed Lattice Structures

Abstract: Lattice structures are currently of high interest, especially for lightweight design. They generally have better structural performance per weight than parts made of bulk material. With conventional manufacturing techniques they are difficult to produce, but with additive manufacturing (AM) fabricationisfeasible. To better understand their behaviour under various loading conditions two lattice structures in different configurations were observed. For each structure three different test specimens were designed and m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the quasi-static and simple impact tests on the non-graded cases, a peak was observed at the beginning of the contact in Figure 7 and Figure 9 ; this behavior was similar to that reported by Heiml et al [ 63 ]. This peak could be attributed to the numeric inelastic buckling that the structure had to overcome in order to collapse [ 80 ], and this was intensified during the impact testing due to the reduced time in which this effect had to take place.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the quasi-static and simple impact tests on the non-graded cases, a peak was observed at the beginning of the contact in Figure 7 and Figure 9 ; this behavior was similar to that reported by Heiml et al [ 63 ]. This peak could be attributed to the numeric inelastic buckling that the structure had to overcome in order to collapse [ 80 ], and this was intensified during the impact testing due to the reduced time in which this effect had to take place.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For instance, the Mooney–Rivlin material model is appropriate to simulate natural rubber of up to a 100% tensile strain [ 56 ], while the Ogden 3rd-order material model better fits carbon black-reinforced rubber with tensile data of up to ε = 6.0, while the Yeoh material model works properly for natural rubber reinforced by carbon-black [ 57 , 58 ]. Particularly for TPU, Ogden, Yeoh, and Mooney–Rivlin material models can be fitted properly if diverse experimental data are within reach [ 59 , 60 , 61 ], but if only uniaxial tensile data are available, the Ogden model provides better results than the other two [ 59 , 62 , 63 ]. Therefore, in this work, the quasi-static average stress–strain curve was fitted to an Ogden 3rd-order material model by using HYPERFIT ® 2.181, which was used as the model input.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%