2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of laser peening on TiAl alloy microstructure and properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [62], have demonstrated similar finding, whereby, microstructures were improved for marine steel, N-155 supper-alloy and TiAl respectively, and a reduction in the grains size of these metals was reported respectively. This has a similar effect to the one found in this work with the Al2O3 armour ceramics.…”
Section: Micro-structural Modifications: Grain Boundary and Morphologsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…al. [62], have demonstrated similar finding, whereby, microstructures were improved for marine steel, N-155 supper-alloy and TiAl respectively, and a reduction in the grains size of these metals was reported respectively. This has a similar effect to the one found in this work with the Al2O3 armour ceramics.…”
Section: Micro-structural Modifications: Grain Boundary and Morphologsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…20,32 The microhardness, compressive residual stress, and microstructure introduced by laser peening created plastic deformation on the implant surface and has higher union capability with joining biomaterial (PMMA used in our study) than nontreated implants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that as the power density increased to a threshold (just as 9 GW cm −2 ), the maximal residual stress is not located in the center of the laser spot where a 'residual stress hole' appeared with a diameter of 0.25 mm, as shown in figure 9(a). This might be due to the rarefaction waves generated by the boundary converged to the spot center causing a reverse plastic deformation at spot center larger than surrounding areas [35,36]. Figure 9(b) presented the results of in-depth residual stress showing that the depth with residual stress increased from ∼160 to ∼460 μm.…”
Section: Dynamic Response Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 96%