Nowadays,
one of the most efficient ways of enhanced oil recovery
(EOR) is gas miscible injection (GMI). In GMI, minimum miscible pressure
(MMP) is the most substantial parameter. The MMP can be estimated
by different methods, such as laboratory methods, using the equation
of states (EOS), empirical correlations, mathematical models, and
artificial intelligence. Among these, laboratory methods of estimating
MMP comprise slim tube displacement (STD), rising bubble apparatus
(RBA), vanishing interfacial tension (VIT), X-ray computerized tomography
(CT), fast fluorescence-based microfluidic (FFBM) method, magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), sonic response method (SRM), rapid pressure
increase (RPI), oil droplet volume measurement (ODVM), and pressure–composition
diagrams (PCDs), all of which are described in detail in this paper.
Furthermore, experimental investigations performed using the mentioned
laboratory methods have been presented. On the other hand, to perform
miscible injection experiments in the matrix–fracture system,
there are methods, such as fractured core plug (FCP), matrix–fracture
system (MFS), modified core holder (MCH), and microconsolidation device
(MCD), that the accomplished studies by the mentioned method have
surveyed. Eventually, it can be deduced that, owing to the difference
between the MMP in conventional and fractured reservoirs, a reliable
method (laboratory or mathematical model) for estimating the MMP in
fractured reservoirs is required.