2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-020-02841-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of temperature swing adsorption system for air dehumidification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, industrial practice, the TSA is operated in a steady cyclic operation which has fixed constant times of the adsorption and desorption phases. However, Kannan et al [14] reported that the desorption temperature and space velocity had the most immense effect on the quality of the dehumidified air comparing with half-cycle time, bed length and adsorption temperature. It may also be noted that they did not have any energy efficiency consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, industrial practice, the TSA is operated in a steady cyclic operation which has fixed constant times of the adsorption and desorption phases. However, Kannan et al [14] reported that the desorption temperature and space velocity had the most immense effect on the quality of the dehumidified air comparing with half-cycle time, bed length and adsorption temperature. It may also be noted that they did not have any energy efficiency consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This complication might be the reason why just a few researchers have tried simulation of pressure based adsorption systems for a small group of applications like separation of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, propane, and methane from the feed stream. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Nevertheless, experimental studies on these systems for water vapour removal from feed air stream are scarce. The existing correlations based on traces of air other than water vapour are not suitable for designing this system to produce product dry air at a low dew point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%