1971
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.4.2441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of the Band Structure of Graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This minimum is indicated a t 272.8 eV in the XPS. From this follows for the experimentally definable energetic distance P; -P'; = 1.8 eV, compared with a theoretical value of 1.5 eV presented by Painter and Ellis [3], and which is in agreement whith the results given by Willis et al [15].…”
Section: Po-and S-electronssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This minimum is indicated a t 272.8 eV in the XPS. From this follows for the experimentally definable energetic distance P; -P'; = 1.8 eV, compared with a theoretical value of 1.5 eV presented by Painter and Ellis [3], and which is in agreement whith the results given by Willis et al [15].…”
Section: Po-and S-electronssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The electronic structure of graphite has been studied extensively both experimentally and theoretically and is discussed elsewhere [14][15][16][17]. The He I spectrum shows a sharp peak at a binding energy of about 13.4eV which arises from photoelectrons scattered into unoccupied states [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I n the case of graphite these transitions would be between critical points in the conduct'ion band, and as the coupling is essentially to the core hole excitation, the E 11 c and E 1 c preconditions for the incident electron would not have to be met. Uowever the data of Willis et al [13] does not afford an unequivocable assignment of the sharp satellites and, furthermore, a satellite corresponding to the strong E 1 c t'ransition a t 4.5 eV is absent. We would suggest, however, that coupling to interband transitions is responsible for the broad hump underlying the narrow loss peaks.…”
Section: The Aps Spectrum Of Pyrolitic Yruphitementioning
confidence: 91%