54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-1071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of the Turbulent Aerodynamic Environment Produced by a Generic Ship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…center of flight deck).Velocity and RMS of velocity fluctuations profiles at x/L=0.708 show that the low Re simulation differs significantly from the model-scale and full-scale Re number simulations in the recirculation region behind the superstructure. The increase in RMS of velocity fluctuations seen at z/L=0.12-0.15 for the full-scale Re is due to the high level of RMS generated at the front of the superstructure being convected into the flight deck region, this is similar to the results reported inSydney et al (2016). At x/L=0.883 the low Re simulation still shows differences in the streamwise velocity profile with a larger boundary layer and the negative vertical velocity is about -0.03 larger in the region close to the flight deck.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…center of flight deck).Velocity and RMS of velocity fluctuations profiles at x/L=0.708 show that the low Re simulation differs significantly from the model-scale and full-scale Re number simulations in the recirculation region behind the superstructure. The increase in RMS of velocity fluctuations seen at z/L=0.12-0.15 for the full-scale Re is due to the high level of RMS generated at the front of the superstructure being convected into the flight deck region, this is similar to the results reported inSydney et al (2016). At x/L=0.883 the low Re simulation still shows differences in the streamwise velocity profile with a larger boundary layer and the negative vertical velocity is about -0.03 larger in the region close to the flight deck.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The DES simulations were also capable of matching the shedding frequencies and turbulent power measured in the wind tunnel experiments. A more recent study done by Sydney et al (2016) used particle image velocimetry (PIV) to analyze the turbulent flow of the SFS2 airwake. The study showed that each of the backward facing steps generated a shear layer as well as a region of recirculation which has significant three-dimensional variations.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Airwakementioning
confidence: 99%