Experimental investigation of transvenous embolization of arteriovenous malformations using different in vivo models

Abstract

BackgroundTransvenous embolization (TVE) is an emerging technique for the endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The aim of this study was to investigate two in vivo AVM models and to assess TVE techniques using these models.MethodsBlood flow in the porcine rete mirabile (RM) was modified by either creating a carotid–jugular fistula or by placing a balloon guide catheter in the carotid artery. The RM was embolized with precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL) 25% via transarterial embolization (TAE; control group) and compared with TVE applying the transvenous retrograde pressure cooker technique and TVE using a Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for flow control (n=6, respectively). The embolization extent (penetration of the RM), the number of events of reflux or embolization distal to the RM and the procedure times were assessed.ResultsThe modified RM could be successfully used for embolization in all cases. There were no significant differences regarding the outcome parameters between the two AVM models (fistula or balloon). TVE using the pressure cooker technique led to a higher extent of embolization (median 98.8% vs 63.5%; p=0.008), a lower number of reflux or distal embolization events (p<0.001) and a shorter procedure time (p<0.001) compared with conventional TAE. TVE using a WEB device for flow control was technically feasible and achieved a moderate extent of embolization (median 83.8%).ConclusionAfter surgical or endovascular modification, the porcine RM is a feasible in vivo AVM model for the investigation of TVE techniques. TVE using the pressure cooker technique is superior to conventional TAE in this experimental model.

Treatment of Challenging Extracranial Arteriovenous Malformations

“…Some embolic agents or sclerosants may also cause dermal fibrosis, volume occupation, or tattoo effect. 16,27 In addition, defects or scars after embolosclerotherapy may cause various disfigurement, which requires surgical repair. For instance, total nasal reconstruction was usually used to repair the defect after embolization (Fig.…”

“…Surgery also plays an important role in the sequelae stage or dealing with complications of previous treatment. Some embolic agents or sclerosants may also cause dermal fibrosis, volume occupation, or tattoo effect 16,27 . In addition, defects or scars after embolosclerotherapy may cause various disfigurement, which requires surgical repair.…”