1955
DOI: 10.2514/8.3262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layers in Hypersonic Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…expression ) has a Mach‐number dependence in addition to a Reynolds number dependence. Above Mach number of unity, the viscous drag coefficient decreases with increasing Mach number [e.g., Eckert , ; Lobb et al ., ; Hill , ]. The physical reasons for the Mach‐number dependence of the Navier‐Stokes drag coefficient are a combination of compressibility of the fluid, changes in the structure of the boundary layers, and thermal transport effects that change the fluid's kinematic viscosity.…”
Section: The Viscous Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…expression ) has a Mach‐number dependence in addition to a Reynolds number dependence. Above Mach number of unity, the viscous drag coefficient decreases with increasing Mach number [e.g., Eckert , ; Lobb et al ., ; Hill , ]. The physical reasons for the Mach‐number dependence of the Navier‐Stokes drag coefficient are a combination of compressibility of the fluid, changes in the structure of the boundary layers, and thermal transport effects that change the fluid's kinematic viscosity.…”
Section: The Viscous Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems natural to ask whether any property like this may also hold for velocity profiles in the turbulent case. In an attempt to answer this question, a set of profiles measured by Lobb et al (1955) is examined in the present paper. These were obtained at Machnumbers between 5 and 8, and momentum-thickness…”
Section: Howarth's Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.1. Outer law Figure 6 shows a set of profiles of u/u, against y/6 measured by Lobb et al (1955) at Mach numbers between 4.93 and 8.18 and stagnation temperatures near 300 OK. The M = 8 profiles lie near a Bth power law, and those for M = 5 near a +th power law.…”
Section: Experimental Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 He simply introduced wall properties for an insulated plate as functions of the free stream Mach Number in his formula for skin friction at low speeds, and evaluated the skin-friction coefficient as a function of the free stream Mach Number. This method receives some a posteriori justification from the results of Lobb, Winkler and Persh, 71 described above, in that they find the law of the wall valid up to high Mach Numbers provided that values of density and viscosity prevailing at the wall are used in the calculation of u* and y*.…”
Section: U*=u/u T =F(yu R /V)=f(y*) (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%