SAE Technical Paper Series 2013
DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-0281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation on different Injection Strategies for Ethanol Partially Premixed Combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests revealed that η t reduces slightly from 0.30 to 0.28 with the higher intake temperature for the single injection case and from 0.26 to 0.24 for the split injection case. The behavior of thermodynamic efficiency is similar to that in the study of Kaiadi et al Higher exhaust losses with higher intake temperature can be the reason for this reduction. η GIE shows the same behavior as η t .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The tests revealed that η t reduces slightly from 0.30 to 0.28 with the higher intake temperature for the single injection case and from 0.26 to 0.24 for the split injection case. The behavior of thermodynamic efficiency is similar to that in the study of Kaiadi et al Higher exhaust losses with higher intake temperature can be the reason for this reduction. η GIE shows the same behavior as η t .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A drawback of PPC is combustion noise, which is higher than in conventional diesel combustion due to the higher pressure-rise rate [10]. Reported strategies to mitigate noise in PPC are multiple injection [11], EGR and optimization of the injection profile [12]. In-cylinder fuel stratification is key in PPC [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent investigations have shown that the use of a multiple injection strategy allows precise control of the fuel-air stratification before the SoC, which affects the timing and strength of auto-ignition as well as the rate and completeness of fuel oxidation throughout the combustion chamber [35,[43][44][45]. Moreover, Sellnau et al confirmed the potential of a triple injection strategy for increasing thermal efficiency compared to single injection strategies thanks to reduced heat losses during the expansion stroke given by a more favorable fuel distribution during combustion which results in less contact between hot combustion gases and chamber walls [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%