2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on masonry arches strengthened with PBO-FRCM composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analyzing the available publications, it can be noted that existing research are mainly based on systems FRP [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The FRCM strengthening, which include Ruredil X Mesh Gold system, is significantly less common [1][2][3]. Some publications raise issues related to the research of strength and deformation of beams reinforced by this FRCM system [11,12], but not include the effect of the initial beam load.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Existing Research and Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing the available publications, it can be noted that existing research are mainly based on systems FRP [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The FRCM strengthening, which include Ruredil X Mesh Gold system, is significantly less common [1][2][3]. Some publications raise issues related to the research of strength and deformation of beams reinforced by this FRCM system [11,12], but not include the effect of the initial beam load.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Existing Research and Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, masonry arch bridges need restoration and should be effectively strengthened while maintaining historical value. Traditional techniques of strengthening (steel bars, stirrups, steel profiles, injecting cementitious mortar, reinforced concrete hoods, and introducing ties at the arch impost) are being abandoned due to the aesthetic incompatibility and extra self-weight and rigidity that these techniques could add to the structure [36]. Recently, composite materials have been used instead of traditional techniques, because they are considered innovative (carbon fiber reinforced polymer, glass reinforced polymer, steel rod, steel-reinforced grout, basalt textile-reinforced mortar, or other fiber materials) [37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional strengthening techniques (i.e., steel profiles or reinforced concrete hoods), which revealed many drawbacks, have been replaced by advanced strengthening solutions, based on the use of polymeric-based composite materials (fiber reinforced polymer, FRP). Innovative composite materials constituted by a fabric embedded in a cement-based matrix (FRCM, fabric reinforced cementitious mortar) are being studied [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] as an alternative to FRPs [19][20][21][22][23], mainly to strengthen historic buildings due to their high compatibility with masonry substrate in terms of resistance to high temperature and vapor permeability. Recently, a natural lime mortar matrix has been proposed as alternative to the cement-based matrix [24] when historic compatibility with the substrate is required, as in case of restorations of monumental buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the paper deals with an experimental campaign on brick masonry arches strengthened at the extrados with Basalt-FRLM. The structural behavior of Basalt-FRLM-strengthened arches is analyzed and compared with the structural behavior of un-strengthened arches and arches strengthened with FRP and FRCM composites tested in a previous step of this research [17,18,25]. The purpose of this research is to provide the first experimental evaluation of the structural effectiveness of lime matrix composite materials for strengthening masonry structures, and to compare it with the effectiveness which can be achieved with more traditional composite materials such as FRPs and FRCMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%