2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on particle transport of coal fines in unsteady terrain slug flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by our daily observations of pipeline cleaning, we discovered that abrupt changes in flow velocity or the introduction of slug flow can clean the PDP. Additionally, we gained insights from relevant studies in fluid mechanics on the impact mechanism of slug flow on pipeline cleaning [ 35 ]. Moreover, also inspired by the SFA [ 29 , 30 ], the utilization of segmented flow can reduce the total online circulation time, thereby enhancing its effectiveness in preventing PDP and PDW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by our daily observations of pipeline cleaning, we discovered that abrupt changes in flow velocity or the introduction of slug flow can clean the PDP. Additionally, we gained insights from relevant studies in fluid mechanics on the impact mechanism of slug flow on pipeline cleaning [ 35 ]. Moreover, also inspired by the SFA [ 29 , 30 ], the utilization of segmented flow can reduce the total online circulation time, thereby enhancing its effectiveness in preventing PDP and PDW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results in the literature [51][52][53] and the practice in the field, 54 the water injection velocity, viscosity of the injection fluid, stacking angle of the coal particle, and angle of the borehole would significantly impact the two-phase flow characteristics. The following scenarios were designed to test the parameter sensitivities, as listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivit Y Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the pressure of the curved pipe is measured by RoseMount pressure sensors in the range of 0-500 kPa, which are installed at the inlet, middle, and outlet of the curve pipe. As shown in Figure 2, the liquid holdup is measured by a conductivity proposed by Fossa (1998) and updated by Zhong et al (2018), which is installed at the outlet of the curve pipe. This method is relatively simple and can record the real-time liquid holdup without breaking the flow pattern.…”
Section: The Experiments Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%