2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-04096-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on response and failure modes of 2D and 3D woven composites under low velocity impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the existence of delaminations, Specimen B goes through I, II and III stages corresponding to the instability failure of daughterboard of ①, ② and ③ respectively. The ultimate strength of Specimen B is much less than that of Specimen A, indicating the degradation of carrying capacity of composite can be extremely influenced by the existence of delaminations, which is confirmed by Kazemianfar et al [18]. According to the comparison of the two mechanical curves, the slope of Specimen A is higher than the overall slope of Specimen B.…”
Section: Effects Of Delaminations On Damage Evolution Of Specimenssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…However, due to the existence of delaminations, Specimen B goes through I, II and III stages corresponding to the instability failure of daughterboard of ①, ② and ③ respectively. The ultimate strength of Specimen B is much less than that of Specimen A, indicating the degradation of carrying capacity of composite can be extremely influenced by the existence of delaminations, which is confirmed by Kazemianfar et al [18]. According to the comparison of the two mechanical curves, the slope of Specimen A is higher than the overall slope of Specimen B.…”
Section: Effects Of Delaminations On Damage Evolution Of Specimenssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The stereo microscope images are similar to the studies in the literature. 57,58
Figure 12.Stereo microscope images of front face and rear face images of the composites as samples (a) A1, (b) A2, (c) B1, (d) B2, (e) C1, (f) C2, (g) D1, and (h) D2. These stereo microscope images were taken after the impact tests.
Figure 13.The stereo microscope images of the surfaces of A1 and A2 composites after impact tests (a) front of A1, (b) backward of A1, (c) front of A2, and (d) backward of A2 composite.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the 3D woven architectures, despite the comparable energy absorption of both the ORT-PW and ORT-TW, the damage is less severe in the former. Moreover, two conventionally used parameters, in literature [15], to assess the level and severity of damage and the resistance of the composite laminates to impact are: (i) the damage degree parameter (DD) and the absorbed energy per delaminated area (E DA /A). These two parameters are widely used for the comparison of composites that possess similar areal density and number of layers, which is the case in this research study.…”
Section: Damage Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A twofold improvement in energy dissipation was reported [1,[11][12][13], owing that to the existence of the z-binding yarns in 3D orthogonal structure. Beside improving the energy absorption, it acts as a restraint to the delamination and structure failure [14,15]. Miao et al [16] explained, utilising the experimental and numerical approaches, that the preventions of the delamination depend on the zig-zag formation of the damages through the composite structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%