2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on the viscosity characteristics of water based SiO2-graphite hybrid nanofluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the impact of the material was very low, and the maximum improvements in the DV of the hybrid nanofluids with the mentioned materials were 13.015%, 13.618% and 12.559%, respectively. However, in a work by Dalkılıç et al [79] on the DV of SiO 2 -graphite/water, it was found that SiO 2 particles had more effect on the DV compared with graphite. The maximum increase in the DV was 36.12%, which was obtained for a solid fraction of 2%.…”
Section: Dynamic Viscositymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that the impact of the material was very low, and the maximum improvements in the DV of the hybrid nanofluids with the mentioned materials were 13.015%, 13.618% and 12.559%, respectively. However, in a work by Dalkılıç et al [79] on the DV of SiO 2 -graphite/water, it was found that SiO 2 particles had more effect on the DV compared with graphite. The maximum increase in the DV was 36.12%, which was obtained for a solid fraction of 2%.…”
Section: Dynamic Viscositymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since the mixture ratio of the nanomaterials can affect the DV of hybrid nanofluids, similar to the TC, considering it as one of the variables would lead to improvement in the comprehensiveness of the models. For instance, Dalkılıç et al [79] used the ratio of graphite weight to silica weight in addition to the temperature and solid fraction to provide a model for the DV of SiO 2 -graphite/water for different mixture ratios of the solid materials. The average deviation of the model by using the mentioned variables as input was 6.75%.…”
Section: Proposed Models For Dynamic Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticles/Base Fluid Preparation Method [24] CuO/EG One-step method (Chemical reduction method) [25] Di-Ag/EG One-step method (Polyol method) [26] TiO2-CuO and C/EG Two-step method [27] Cu/EG and DEG Two-step method [28] SiO2-Graphite/Water Two-step method [29] Al2O3-SiO2/Water Two-step method [30] Si3N4/EG Two-step method [31] Al2O3-TiO2/NA Two-step method [32] TiO2/Water Two-step method [18] Si/Water Two-step method [33] SWCNT-MgO/EG Two-step method [34] Ag and Au/Water One-step method [35] Cu/Methanol Two-step method [36] CuO-TiO2/Water Two-step method…”
Section: Author(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nabil et al [26] using (TiO 2 -SiO 2 )/ (H 2 O and EG) based hybrid nanofluid recorded an increase in dynamic viscosity by about 2% upon raising nanoparticle volume fraction from (2-3%) at a temperature of 30℃. Dalkılıç et al [28] working with (SiO 2 -Graphite/H 2 O) based hybrid nanofluid reported a sharp rise in the viscosity of the nanofluid when silica nanoparticles were suspended in the base fluid as compared to graphite nanoparticles. A study by Afshari et al [29] revealed a change in properties of the nanofluid beyond 0.5vol.% concentration of nanoparticles from Newtonian to pseudoplastic non-Newtonian.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Volume Fraction and Viscosity Of Nanofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%