Experimental Investigation to Enhance the Performance of Freezer with Phase Change Material

Vinod, Mummina; Chakravarthi, V. Mahesh; Mangam, Venu; Krishna, Duvvuri Vamsee

doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4606-6_89

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All tests show detectable damage to the specimen visible to the naked eye. Vinod and Mahesh 18 experimented with and investigated the sliding wear of the E glass composite. It is fabricated using E glass fiber, Epoxy LY556 is used here as matrix material, and the filler material employed here is alumina (Al 2 O 3 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental analysis of mechanical properties of e-waste composite materials with dual glass fibers

Raja,

Ayyakkannu,

Rathinasamy

2024

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical characteristics and application of e-waste as a filler for glass fiber composites made of S and E (e-waste + S E). Metal, printed circuit boards, integrated circuits, diodes, and transistors were separated from the e-waste filler during milling. S and E glass fiber, epoxy, and filler were utilized in proportions of 10%, 10%, and 70%, respectively, on a volume basis. The hand lay-up technique was used to construct composite specimens. Scanning electron microscope analysis was used to gauge how filler loading affected the morphology of composite materials. The composite has a compressive strength of 23.760 MPa, which is 69.71% higher than the Geo poly composite. The tensile strength of this composite is withstood up to 16.078 MPa. It has 53% better tensile properties than Sunflower Husk composites with the same operating conditions. It gives a resistance up to 42 D during hardness test to withstand. It was 15.6% better than the NF30% epoxy composite specimen. The e-waste + S E composite gives a great opposite force of up to 2 kJ on the impact load test.; it was 86.9% higher than fly ash epoxy composites.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%