SAE Technical Paper Series 1984
DOI: 10.4271/840097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigations into the Performance of Porous Journal Bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…results (1994). Figure 5 shows the comparison of the dimensionless load capacity versus the relative eccentricity between our results and experimental data of Mokhtar et al (1984). As it is illustrated in the figure, good agreement is observed between our numerical results and experimental data of Mokhtar et al (1984).…”
Section: Fig 4 Evolution Of Load Capacity Versus Eccentricity Resusupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…results (1994). Figure 5 shows the comparison of the dimensionless load capacity versus the relative eccentricity between our results and experimental data of Mokhtar et al (1984). As it is illustrated in the figure, good agreement is observed between our numerical results and experimental data of Mokhtar et al (1984).…”
Section: Fig 4 Evolution Of Load Capacity Versus Eccentricity Resusupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These studies have shown that the increase in the permeability generates a decrease in the characteristics of the bearings: load capacity, pressure. Experimental results of Mokhtar et al (1984) have confirmed these results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters are used as input data for all the results to be presented in the following sections. Figurc 2 shows a comparison between the results of the present numerical solution and the experimental results reported by Mokhtar et al (13). It is assumed that the experimental results were measured for a perfectly aligned journal bearing (i.e.…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…i s may be another reason for the difference between the three predictions. The geometry and operating parameters of the Mokhtar et al (13) bearing are given in Table 4. These parameters are used as input data for all the results to be presented in the following sections.…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%