2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2008.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigations on a cyclone separator performance at an extremely low particle concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rising solid loading rate from 4.98g/m 3 to 130.8g/m 3 at three different inlet velocity conditions, noticed a dramatic increment of overall collection efficiency at low velocity conditions [11], [12]. Considering extremely low particle loading rates, from 5mg to 20000mg, overall and grade efficiency curves were studied by [8], for small scale cyclone separators and observed a similar increment behavior for low to high inlet velocity conditions. In addition, this study indicated that at low solid loading conditions, particle agglomeration is significant in particle separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rising solid loading rate from 4.98g/m 3 to 130.8g/m 3 at three different inlet velocity conditions, noticed a dramatic increment of overall collection efficiency at low velocity conditions [11], [12]. Considering extremely low particle loading rates, from 5mg to 20000mg, overall and grade efficiency curves were studied by [8], for small scale cyclone separators and observed a similar increment behavior for low to high inlet velocity conditions. In addition, this study indicated that at low solid loading conditions, particle agglomeration is significant in particle separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…But a survey of experimental results from literature considering a loading range of 2.3 to 228.8g/m 3 , has showed a increase of collection efficiency with the increase of solid loading rate [7] (as reported by [8]). For coarse range particle application is observed the same behavior for particle loading rate up to 100g/m 3 [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars used experimental and numerical simulation method to study on the separation performance of single cyclone separators (Molerus and Glückler, 1996;Fassani and Leonardo, 2000;Yoshida et al, 2001;Su and Mao, 2006;Wan et al, 2008;Ji et al, 2009;Hsiao et al, 2011;Su et al, 2011;Karagoz et al, 2013;and so on). Moreover, some other scholars researched the parallel operation of cyclone separators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few research reports have been published in areas such as the difference and correlation between multicyclone separator and single cyclone separator and how to calculate the multicyclone separator pressure drop under high pressure. In this study, the separation performance of multicyclone separator was measured by using the online measurement method as described in reference (Ji et al, 2009). The single separator and the multicyclone cyclone separator were compared in the separation performance and pressure drop under same inlet conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic components of an IPS are shown in figure 4.1, and follow the same principles of a cyclone separator [29,30] . Contaminated air enters the inlet and the mixed flow makes a turn aft of the hub where the particles have sufficient inertia to prevent them from following the air around this sharp corner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%